I gave AI and got an answer. most are OK, maybe some numbers were my own fault
Okay, let me start by understanding the user's request. They want a table that includes the hex code, their provided temperature, the calculated temperature using the formula, and the error between the two. The formula given is Temperature = -0.09 Γ hex_value + 70.55, where hex_value is derived from the second and third bytes in little-endian.
First, I need to process each hex string. For example, take d23302. The second and third bytes are 33 and 02. In little-endian, that's 0x0233, which is 563 in decimal. Applying the formula: -0.09*563 +70.55 = 19.88, which matches the user's value. That's good.
Next, some hex codes start with 92, like 92b702. The bytes here are B7 and 02, which is 0x02B7 = 695. Using the formula: -0.09*695 +70.55 = 7.0, but the user's value is 8.39. There's a discrepancy here. Wait, maybe the formula isn't the same for all prefixes. The user mentioned that some entries, like those starting with 92, might use a different scaling. For example, 92de00: bytes DE and 00 make 0x00DE = 222. Using the formula gives 70.55 -0.09*222 = 50.57, but the actual temp is 59.75. That's a big error. So maybe these entries use a different formula, like direct scaling. For instance, 222 * 0.268 β 59.5, which is close. But the user wants to apply the original formula for all. Hmm.
Wait, the user provided some examples where the formula works for D2, 12, 52 prefixes but not for some 92. So maybe I should proceed with the formula as given, even if some entries have larger errors. The user wants to see the calculated temps and the errors, so I need to apply the formula to all and note discrepancies.
I need to process each line, extract the second and third bytes, convert to little-endian, compute the value, apply the formula, then compare with the user's temp. Let's start listing them one by one.
For instance, d27602: bytes 76 and 02. 0x0276 = 630. Formula: -0.09*630 +70.55 = 70.55 -56.7 =13.85. But the user's value is 13.57. Error is about 0.28. That's okay.
Another example, 92ab02: bytes AB and 02. 0x02AB = 683. Formula: 70.55 -0.09*683 = 70.55 -61.47 =9.08. User's temp is 8.39. Error 0.69.
Wait, but the user's temp for 92ab02 is 8.39, but calculated is 9.08. So error is 0.69. That's a bit off. Maybe there's a rounding difference or the formula isn't perfect for these.
For 926a01: bytes 6A and 01. Little-endian is 0x016A = 362. Formula: 70.55 -32.58 =37.97. User has 40.47. Error 2.5. That's significant. Maybe the formula isn't right here.
But the user wants to see all calculated temps with the formula given, even if there are errors. So proceed.
Now, some entries have commas as decimal separators, others periods. Need to standardize for calculation. Also, note that 92d400 has two temps: 57 58. Assume it's 57.58. But written as 57 58. Maybe a typo. Let's check. Original user input: "92d400 temp 57 58". Probably a typo, maybe 57.58. So take that as 57.58.
Proceeding line by line. For each hex code:
1. Split the hex into second and third bytes. For example, d23302: bytes 2 and 3 are '33' and '02'.
2. Convert to little-endian: reverse the bytes to '0233' (but wait, the bytes are in order 33 02, so little-endian is 0x0233).
3. Convert that to decimal: 563.
4. Apply formula: -0.09 *563 +70.55 = 19.88 (matches).
5. Error is 0.
Now, for hex codes starting with 92, like 92b702: bytes B7 02 β 02B7 = 695. Formula: -0.09*695= -62.55 +70.55=8.00. User's temp is 8.39. Error: 8.39 -8.00=0.39. Wait, but in the previous example, the user's temp was 8.39, calculated is 8.00. So error is +0.39.
Wait, but earlier when I calculated 92ab02 (683), the formula gave 9.08, but user's temp is 8.39. So error -0.69. Hmm, inconsistencies.
But regardless, proceed. The user wants all calculated, even with errors.
Now, compiling all into a table. Need to be careful with each hex code, extract the bytes correctly, convert to little-endian, apply formula, compute error. Let me list all entries and process them step by step.
Let me start with the first few to check:
d23302 β bytes 33 02 β 0x0233 =563 β -0.09*563= -50.67 +70.55=19.88 β matches. Error 0.
d23202 β 32 02 β0x0232=562 β -50.58 +70.55=19.97 β matches. Error 0.
d27602 β76 02 β0x0276=630 β-56.7 +70.55=13.85 β user 13.57 β error -0.28.
d28602 β86 02 β0x0286=646 β-58.14 +70.55=12.41 β user 12.03 β error -0.38.
92b702 βB7 02 β0x02B7=695 β-62.55 +70.55=8.00 β user 8.39 β error +0.39.
92c602 βC6 02 β0x02C6=710 β-63.9 +70.55=6.65 β user 5.67 β error -0.98.
92cf02 βCF 02 β0x02CF=719 β-64.71 +70.55=5.84 β user 4.74 β error -1.10.
92d602 βD6 02 β0x02D6=726 β-65.34 +70.55=5.21 β user 4.01 β error -1.20.
92e102 βE1 02 β0x02E1=737 β-66.33 +70.55=4.22 β user 1.01 β error -3.21. Wow, big error here.
92ab02 βAB 02 β0x02AB=683 β-61.47 +70.55=9.08 β user 8.39 β error -0.69.
923302 β33 02 β same as d23302? Wait, hex is 923302. Wait, bytes are 33 02? Wait, the hex is 92 33 02. So second and third bytes are 33 02 β same as before, 0x0233=563 β same calculation:19.88. User's temp is 19.97. Wait, no. Wait, hex 923302: bytes are 33 and 02. So 0x0233=563. So formula gives 19.88, but user's temp is 19.97. So error +0.09. Wait, but in the first entry, d23302 also has 19.88. So why here, same hex value but different prefix (92 vs d2) leading to same calculation but user's temp is different? That's confusing. But according to the formula, same result. So this entry has a discrepancy. Maybe a typo in the user's data?
Similarly, the next entry is 923302 again, same calculation, user temp 19.97. Error +0.09.
926a01 β6A 01 β0x016A=362 β-32.58 +70.55=37.97 β user 40.47 β error +2.50.
921101 β11 01 β0x0111=273 β-24.57 +70.55=45.98 β user 51.80 β error +5.82.
92d400 βD4 00 β0x00D4=212 β-19.08 +70.55=51.47 β user 57.58 (assuming typo) β error +6.11.
92de00 βDE 00 β0x00DE=222 β-19.98 +70.55=50.57 β user 59.75 β error +9.18.
923301 β33 01 β0x0133=307 β-27.63 +70.55=42.92 β user 50.81 β error +7.89.
924201 β42 01 β0x0142=322 β-28.98 +70.55=41.57 β user 46.53 β error +4.96.
d28601 β86 01 β0x0186=390 β-35.1 +70.55=35.45 β user 37.32 β error +1.87.
d29901 β99 01 β0x0199=409 β-36.81 +70.55=33.74 β user 35.27 β error +1.53.
12d701 βD7 01 β0x01D7=471 β-42.39 +70.55=28.16 β user 32.13 β error +3.97.
12ea01 βEA 01 β0x01EA=490 β-44.1 +70.55=26.45 β user 27.01 β error +0.56.
52f701 βF7 01 β0x01F7=503 β-45.27 +70.55=25.28 β user 25.74 β error +0.46.
920102 β01 02 β0x0201=513 β-46.17 +70.55=24.38 β user 24.77 β error +0.39.
920402 β04 02 β0x0204=516 β-46.44 +70.55=24.11 β user 24.48 β error +0.37.
120a02 β0A 02 β0x020A=522 β-46.98 +70.55=23.57 β user 23.90 β error +0.33.
121502 β15 02 β0x0215=533 β-47.97 +70.55=22.58 β user 22.84 β error +0.26.
122302 β23 02 β0x0223=547 β-49.23 +70.55=21.32 β user 21.50 β error +0.18.
122b02 β2B 02 β0x022B=555 β-49.95 +70.55=20.60 β user 20.73 β error +0.13.
924c02 β4C 02 β0x024C=588 β-52.92 +70.55=17.63 β user 17.59 β error -0.04.
125902 β59 02 β0x0259=601 β-54.09 +70.55=16.46 β user 16.35 β error -0.11.
125c02 β5C 02 β0x025C=604 β-54.36 +70.55=16.19 β user 16.06 β error -0.13.
525f02 β5F 02 β0x025F=607 β-54.63 +70.55=15.92 β user 15.78 β error -0.14.
126502 β65 02 β0x0265=613 β-55.17 +70.55=15.38 β user 15.20 β error -0.18.
126702 β67 02 β0x0267=615 β-55.35 +70.55=15.20 β user 15.01 β error -0.19.
126902 β69 02 β0x0269=617 β-55.53 +70.55=15.02 β user 14.82 β error -0.20.
526b02 β6B 02 β0x026B=619 β-55.71 +70.55=14.84 β user 14.63 β error -0.21.
526f02 β6F 02 β0x026F=623 β-56.07 +70.55=14.48 β user 14.34 β error -0.14.
127202 β72 02 β0x0272=626 β-56.34 +70.55=14.21 β user 13.96 β error -0.25.
127302 β73 02 β0x0273=627 β-56.43 +70.55=14.12 β user 13.86 β error -0.26.
d27302 β73 02 β0x0273=627 β same as above β14.12 vs user 13.86 β error -0.26.
Same for the next d27302 β same result.
927402 β74 02 β0x0274=628 β-56.52 +70.55=14.03 β user 13.77 β error -0.26.
Another 927402 β same.
526902 β69 02 β0x0269=617 β-55.53 +70.55=15.02 β user 15.11 β error +0.09.
926902 β69 02 β same as above β15.02 vs 15.30 β error +0.28.
d26902 β69 02 β same β15.02 vs 15.59 β error +0.57.
d23402 β34 02 β0x0234=564 β-50.76 +70.55=19.79 β user 19.88 β error +0.09.
523502 β35 02 β0x0235=565 β-50.85 +70.55=19.70 β user 19.78 β error +0.08.
Now compiling all these into a table. Need to ensure that each entry is processed correctly. Also, note that some entries have multiple instances (like 923302 appearing twice), but the calculated temp varies when the formula is applied, depending on the hex code's bytes. Wait, no, in the case of 923302, the bytes are 33 and 02, same as d23302. But since the prefix is 92 instead of d2, but the formula uses only the second and third bytes, the calculated temp is the same. However, the user's temp for 923302 is 19.97, while for d23302 it's 19.88. So same hex value but different reported temps. This suggests that maybe the first byte (prefix) affects the calculation, but according to the initial instructions, the formula only uses the second and third bytes. This inconsistency indicates possible errors in the user's data or that the formula might not be universally applicable.
But proceeding as per the user's request to apply the formula regardless. The table will show these discrepancies. The user can then see where the formula works and where it doesn't.
Now, assembling all these calculations into a table. Each row will have Hex, Actual Temp, Calculated Temp, Error. Error is Actual - Calculated. But need to check decimal separators. Some temps use commas, others periods. Assume all commas are decimal points. For example, 19,88 is 19.88. Similarly, 13.77 is already with a period. So convert all to decimal points.